ORDER 25, RULE 1-2 | SECURITY FOR COSTS

ORDER 25, RULE 1-2

ORDER XXV::::SECURITY FOR COSTS

Rule 1. When security for costs may be required from plaintiff.

(1) Where, at any stage of a suit, it appears to the Court that a sole plaintiff is, or (when there are more plaintiffs than one) that all the plaintiffs are residing out of  [Pakistan], and that such plaintiff does not, or that no one of such plaintiff's does, possess any sufficient immoveable property within  [Pakistan] other than the property in suit, the Court may, either of its own motion or on the application of any defendant, order the plaintiff or plaintiffs, within a time fixed by it, to give security for the payment of all costs incurred and likely to be incurred by any defendant.

(2) Residence out of Pakistan. Whoever leaves [Pakistan] under such circumstances as to afford reasonable probability that he will not be forthcoming whenever he may be called upon to pay costs shall be deemed to be residing out of  [Pakistan] within the meaning of sub-rule (1).

(3) On the application of any defendant in a suit for the payment of money, in which the plaintiff is a woman, the Court may at any stage of the suit make a like order if it is satisfied that such plaintiff does not possess any sufficient immoveable property within  [Pakistan].

Rule 2. Effect of failure to furnish security.

(1) In the event of such security not being furnished within the time fixed, the Court shall make an order dismissing the suit unless the plaintiff or plaintiffs are permitted to withdraw therefrom.

(2) Where a suit is dismissed under this rule, the plaintiff may apply for an order to set the dismissal aside, and, if it is proved to the satisfaction of the Court that he was prevented by any sufficient cause from furnishing the security within the time allowed, the Court shall set aside the dismissal upon such terms as to security, costs or otherwise as it thinks fit, and shall appoint a day for proceeding with the suit.

(3) The dismissal shall not be set aside unless notice of such application has been served on the defendant.

Explanation of ORDER 25, RULE 1-2

Enter your Description here...

Feedback

"We’re always working to improve and keep our information accurate,complete & up-to-date. If you spot any mistakes, missing details, or anything that doesn’t seem right, please let us know using the feedback option below.

Ask a Free Question

Please DO NOT mention any person / party / company's name /Address/Contact # in your Question. If this is a matrimonial or property question, please mention your religion as laws may differ.
Your contact Details
You will be notified by Email/SMS when you receive an answer from a Lawyer.
We'll never share your email and contact info with anyone else.

No video available.

LAW GAT TEST

We provide multiple practice sessions specifically designed to help aspiring lawyers prepare effectively for the Law GAT (Graduate Assessment Test).as Per Outline "

💬 Need Help?
WhatsApp Chat

حَسْبِيَ اللَّهُ لاَ إِلَهَ إِلاَّ هُوَ عَلَيْهِ تَوَكَّلْتُ وَهُوَ رَبُّ الْعَرْشِ الْعَظِيمِ

“Allah is sufficient for me. There is none worthy of worship but Him. I have placed my trust in Him. He is the Lord of the Majestic throne.”